The Institute for Health Research 
is an exempt, nonprofit, nongovernmental organization (NGO)
dedicated to establishing a central information resource for
holistic, advanced therapy healthcare research.
IHR Journal
The Institute's  Online Open Source
International Journal 
of Natural Health, Science and Policy

InHeRe Pillar

The IHR Journal is an Open Source Journal
Of Scholarly Papers on Health, Science and Policy
To Submit a Paper or Comment on a Published Paper
Email Ralph.Fucetola@gmail.com 


Food Freedom eJournal: 2009 - 2011
IHR Journal 2015

IHR Journal 2016
    Restoring Science Symposium: 2016
IHR Journal 2017
     Murata-san on The Crisis of Civilization

IHR Journal 2018

Incorporating the Food Freedom eJournal
(2009 - 2011)

IHR Journal 2015 Edition

Rima E. Laibow, MD
The Real Costs of Medical Decision Making in a
Commercialized, Politicized Health Care System
Presented February 2015
[2]  The Science, Law and Clinical Practice of Cannabidiol Nutrition
Rima E. Laibow, MD & Ralph Fucetola JD
Published June 23, 2015
[3] Informed Consent: 
What is it? 
Who Needs it?  Who Gets it?  Who Cares?

Rima E. Laibow, MD & Ralph Fucetola JD
With Maj. Gen. Bert Stubblebine (US Army, Ret.)
Published July 11, 2015
[4]  The Potential of Math as Medicine
BioAcoustics and Human Health
Sharry Edwards, MEd


IHR Journal 2016 Edition

Gary Null, Ph.D

[6] The Summer of Zika: A Special Report
Rima E. Laibow MD
Published 11 August 2016


Papers Presented at the Restoring Science Symposium
40th Indian Social Sciences Congress - December 19 - 23, 2016

Ralph Fucetola JD: Paper #1
To Reclaim Science the Social Sciences Must Overcome Political and Crony Corporate Control

Rima E. Laibow MD:
   NUTRICIDE - The Killing Fields of Codex: Paper #2 - http://www.InHeRe.org/NUTRICIDE.pdf
   Regulation and Results: Paper #3 -

Richard Sacks Interviews Dr. Andrew Moulden, Posthumously: Paper #4
http://www.InHeRe.org/Dr. Moulden-archive-12-10-16(1).pdf

Richard Sacks: Original Science, Fallen Science, and Direct Perception: Paper #5

Sharry Edwards, MEd: Breaking the Sound Barriers of Disease: Paper #6
http://www.InHeRe.org/Breaking the Sound Barriers of Disease 2017.pdf


IHR Journal 2017 Edition

Hon. Mitsuhei Murata: The Crisis of Civilization


IHR Journal 2018 Edition

Autism and Natural Health
Rima E. Laibow, MD

Abstract:   Rima E. Laibow, MD addresses, from her nearly half century of clinical experience as a psychologist and physician, the profound disorder of autism. This paper expresses Dr. Rima’s view of the autism tragedy and the autism spectrum.  She reviews the toxic environment that leads to the disorder and she establishes the necessary conditions for the development of therapies to address autism and its cure.  She concludes: “Even if every external cause of autism, including vaccination and toxic chemicals, were to vanish from our world tomorrow, the autistic casualties of their use would not similarly vanish.  We have among us millions and millions of chemically and vaccine damaged individuals, often then further damaged by drugs and more chemicals. And yet, do they not deserve our compassionate care? 


Comments to FDA at Regulations.gov on Homeopathy Guidance

Rima E. Laibow, MD and Ralph Fucetola JD

In re: Drug Products Labeled as Homeopathic        }           COMMENTS REGARDING
Draft Guidance for Food and Drug                           }           FDA GUIDANCE
Administration Staff and Industry                             }           FDA Docket FDA-2017-D-6580

Abstract:   Rima E. Laibow, MD and Ralph Fuctola JD comment on the proposed FDA Guidance.

1.      The Food and Drug Administration (FDA)’s attempt to restrict the development of homeopathy by applying pharmaceutical drug “risk/benefit” analysis was never authorized by Congress.

2.      FDA is required to conduct evaluations using appropriate methodological methods and tools.  “Risk/Benefit” Analysis is a methodologically inappropriate tool when any potential benefit has been assumed, a priori, to be zero, as in the FDA’s use of “risk/benefit”.

3.      Biological individuality precludes the application of standard pharmaceutical “risk/benefit” analysis. One of the central premises upon which classical homeopathy is based is that biological individuality must be accounted for in order to apply a remedy for a clinical benefit. the proposed “risk/benefit” evaluation of this medical art which precludes consideration and evaluation of biological individuality is impossible, rendering “risk/benefit” analysis invalid in this application.

4.      “Risk/benefit” analysis is valid only when all variables are controlled for but this is impossible both in Holistic Health and in homeopathic interventions since the personalization of the requirements of each individual’s needs are so particularistic to preclude valid comparison or control subjects using the diagnostic schema of the systems themselves.  Application of other diagnostic schemata for evaluation of “risk/benefit” values is a logical absurdity and renders any “risk/benefit” analysis meaningless, even if the presumption of zero benefit is nullified.

5.      Holistic health care, such as homeopathy, is not a proper subject for standard pharmaceutical “risk/benefit” analysis because it is not unitary and is highly personalized.

6.      Pharmaceutical care similarly becomes an improper subject for “risk/benefit” analysis once a single drug is no longer the subject of the evaluation and the subject has entered the realm of polypharmacy.

7.      The Homeopathic Pharmacopeia of the United States (HPUS) remains the appropriate non-governmental source of substantiated Homeopathic Provings.

8.      Homeopathic remedies are specifically protected by law (Citation) from being evaluated or regulated as if they were pharmaceuticals. The attempt by the FDA to do so is outside the regulatory and legal authority of that agency.

9.      FDA lacks the legal authority to curtail access to, sale or use of Homeopathic remedies since they are part of the English Common Law Tradition as a protected under the Herbalists Charter.

10.  The Case Law of the several States is clear: Americans have the right to seek to achieve and maintain a healthy status using means that are not part of standard, licensed medicine approved by Federal Agencies.

© Copyright 2009 - 2018